Skip to content
vs Private package registries

Slipstream vs the alternatives

A private package registry that sells packages, without JFrog enterprise prices

JFrog Artifactory is the gold standard for enterprise registries, priced enterprise. GitHub Packages is free-ish, but there's no monetization layer. Cloudsmith is SaaS, priced by bandwidth and package count. Slipstream runs six ecosystems (Composer, npm, PyPI, Cargo, Go, NuGet) from one self-hosted binary, with Stripe billing built in and a dependency accelerator for lock-file prefetch.

Side by side

The dimensions that matter

Option Pricing modelScalingData residencyCustomizationLock-in
Slipstream
Self-hosted
Flat per-container licence + your StripeSplit binary — server + worker on KubernetesYour S3 + CDNPlugin architecture per ecosystemLow — standard protocols
JFrog Artifactory
Enterprise
EnterpriseSelf-host or cloudYour choiceRichMedium
GitHub Packages
SaaS
Per-GBManaged by GitHubGitHubLimitedHigh — GitHub auth
Cloudsmith
SaaS
Per-user + bandwidthManagedCloudsmithUI-drivenMedium
Honest breakdown

What each alternative is good at — and where it falls short

Every tool here is excellent. Read the strengths. Then read where it stops fitting your situation.

JFrog Artifactory

Enterprise

Strength

Enterprise registry supporting every ecosystem imaginable, strong security and XRay integration.

Where it falls short

Enterprise pricing, enterprise motion. Monetization isn't part of the product — you don't sell packages through Artifactory. Complex to deploy and run.

Pricing model

Enterprise — contact sales.

GitHub Packages

SaaS

Strength

Integrated with GitHub auth and CI, free for public repos, convenient for private ones too.

Where it falls short

Storage and bandwidth metered. No monetization — can't sell packages through it. Tied to GitHub.

Pricing model

Per-GB stored + per-GB bandwidth.

Cloudsmith

SaaS

Strength

Universal package registry SaaS supporting many ecosystems in one UI.

Where it falls short

Per-package-count and per-bandwidth pricing. Your packages live in Cloudsmith. No Stripe-gated consumer model.

Pricing model

Per-user + per-GB + per-download tiers.

Our take

If you want to publish AND monetize packages without Artifactory-scale procurement, Slipstream is the single binary that does both.

Why self-host

The principles behind self-hosting

These apply across every comparison on this site — not just this one.

Flat-rate cost model

A self-hosted container costs the same whether it processes 100 jobs or 10 million. SaaS and cloud alternatives meter per request, minute, or connection — costs scale linearly with usage.

Your data stays in your VPC

No cross-border data transfer. No vendor data-processing agreements. Compliance, residency, and audit are simpler when data never leaves.

No vendor lock-in

Every service speaks open standards — MQTT 5, OpenAPI, OCI Distribution, Redis protocol, S3 API. Migrating away is a DNS change, not a rewrite.

One contract across your stack

One platform contract. Once your team learns one service, onboarding the next is an afternoon. Compare to mastering AWS IoT and Document Intelligence and MediaConvert separately.

Scale on the boxes you already have

Every service is stateless HTTP plus a worker pool. Helm charts ship with every image. If you have a Kubernetes cluster, you already have the platform.

Extend without asking permission

Need a custom task, a new notification driver, or a bespoke integration? The source is yours to modify. No vendor roadmap. No feature request backlog.

Ready when you are

Try Slipstream. See the difference.

One Docker container. One live demo. Five minutes to see it running on your stack.